Related Articles
Report
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Questions surround oilfield services M&A activity

Difficult trading conditions bring uncertainty to M&A activity in a tense oilfield services sector

Two major mergers, that bringing Halliburton together with Baker Hughes and Schlumberger with Cameron International, both made sense when they were launched. They involved big companies getting together to save costs and beef up their offerings at a time when demand was plummeting and prices slumping. But now one of these tie-ups looks a distinctly better move than the other. Whereas global market leader Schlumberger’s acquisition of Cameron seems all but done – the companies hope to complete it in the first quarter of this year – Halliburton and Baker Hughes, the world’s second and third largest oilfield services firms, are still struggling to persuade takeover authorities in key markets t

Also in this section
Saudi Arabia pushes ahead with IPO
22 March 2017
The state firm is making the right noises about its privatisation, but the clock is ticking and market fundamentals could still shift
An M&A lifeline in the North Sea
15 March 2017
Assets that cut tax bills could be a blessing for UKCS operators looking for a bargain
Depth, breadth and data
15 March 2017
Fresh from the merger with Baker Hughes, GE Oil & Gas boss tells Petroleum Economist about his firm's plans for digital analysis, cost-cutting and recovery